Yrah, but your arguments are all over the place and full of double standards.

You argue that misandry is callously and deliberately dismissed as though it is a direct equivalent to misogyny.

It's not. Misogyny has the added factor of being systemic as well as individual. Misandry does not. Further, when misogyny is dismissed, it is dismissed on the geounds of being both correct and natural. Misandry is most dismissed as a function of the word itself being used incorrectly or weaponized to enact misogyny as in the example I gave that you see a lot here on Medium. That was one, there are others.

Now you argue that misandry is dismissed because people believe it isn't possible, or any of the other things you mentioned. The inference here is that misogyny is recognized and that's why it gets media play or attention. This is not a valid argument. Misogyny for the most part is not recognized either because it IS so normalized. Until recently, when the sexual violence has reached such a a fever pitch it cannot be born anymore, it for next to no media play. Also, men are not beint hunted in the streets, targeted for harassment by women for the sole fact that they are men. You're not being murdered by the woman you got pregnant. Misandrists mostly judt want you to leave them alone. They speak harshly of men, but that's mild. They're not inciting violence against you in the way misogynists do.