You're tone policing. You don't like how I say what I say. So you see outrage even though you don't know me or Penguin.

I happen to be quite fond of the little ornithological boxer. Fond enough to say when I they they're off the mark. They do the same in they're preferred style of doing so, which ca be quite acerbic.

And being angry because some wingnuts areally basically pissing in your sandbox and, in essence, vandalizing the social commons is not the same as being outraged, performatively or otherwise.

Ita about like me sitting over in America all comfy cozy (in the regard of not having a royalty problem) and telling Brits who are against the monarchy and speak out against their ever present bullshit that they should just ignore it and stop giving the attention.

That would be a little tone deaf, all things considered. British people CAN'T ignore them. Half the country is obsessed with them and the media is making money off that creating and sustaining that obsession, no matter what. And there's all the money involved. Always. The money.

And do you think all the British pedophiles will show an ounce of shame if public censure and scorn is hurled at Andrew at every opportunity since he will never face a courtroom? Might want to think about that. Don't little British boys deserve their fair share, their fair time in the proverbial sandbo, a fair and accessible Social Commons? Do you think they'll have it if raging pedophiles get free reign because Andrew legitimized and normalized that bullshit and no one else said boo because of the outrage bandwagon trope?

It's the same with Fuentes. He's a raging misogynist.

There is no win here. The money behind him makes that impossible.