You're missing the point. You're ignoring the broader consequences of Andrew not facing scrutiny because it doesnt affect you personally. You're not under age and and a possible target, you don't have children who are.

You'll bring up the legal angle and ignore that he was protected from a broader investigation. It doesn't matter that he's taken a back seat in Royalty shit. It doesn't matter that other Royals are also Douchebags and that's now common knowledge. It wasn't to me because, over here across the pond, I can afford to ignore all Royal bullshit and pretend they don't exist. Wwhich is what you're advocating.

But you can't ignore the Royals because whatever their fuckwittedness de jour of the day is, your media is making money off it, your public is obsessed, and both of those facts and the landscape they create is up in your grill in some way every day. Tomorrow it will be some different Royal fuckwittedness and you will be more or less concerned based on what it is and how it affects you.

That's the point. To prextend otherwise is asinine and it would be tone deaf for an American to tell you to just ignore it.

You may cate less about pedophile down the block. Fine. But I doubt the parents of underage boys who live in whatever village he has a summer home in feel the same way. Because we know it was more than just the one barely legal 17 year old, there's credible suspicion he's been involved in trafficking, and and we know he was protected from a full investogstion.

You don't get to decide for someone else what's of more concern or what their focus should be.

Parents fret about thsir children. Constantly. You don't want creeps around your kids. And you sure as he'll don't ignore it.

You and whoocheecoo don't get to claim someone else is outraged because their focus of concern is something you don't care about or aren't affected by but then go on to push back against things that are important to you but claim rationality in your own 'outrage' just because you don't like how they said it.

And don't even get me started on the ironly and hypocrisy of both your comments and opinions on 4b and decenter men movements, which is what? Ultimately?

Ignoring the fuckwits, right?Concentreating on 'bigger, more important' issues.

You've both had plenty to say about what a dumb idea you think that is. How it won't do anything. How it hurts men and creates more angry young men. All the things.

But Fuentes should just be ignored, even though ignoring him creates more incels and angry young men.

Hmn.