You’re assuming that people at the time.had made the connection that sex leads to babies. 60,000 years ago? That’s debatable.

You might be on to something about the existential crisis though. I’d say it has more to do with fear of the natural world than it does immortality. Then, if women represent nature, it makes sense men would come to fear and hate women too.

There’s been much ado about testosterone that also, frankly just doesn’t hold up. Newer research is bearing that out. I believe another commenter listed the study I was going to reference so I won’t repeat it.

Lastly, you like many others, are still looking at it through a male (patriarchal) lens. But women would have had to go along with this. They have never been without agency, even in the darkest of circumstances. In fact, at some point, probably well before the code of Hammurabi stripped them of agency over their own body, they had to have promoted it. Otherwise it wouldn’t have arisen. It had to have been more than being “conquered" too because there are a lot of ways to die and a lot of ways to kill. Men are just as vulnerable as women and always have been. You just don’t realize it because of cultural andophilia.

I’ll give an example. An elderly Ukrainian woman just took out a unit of Russian soldiers. Yeah. She invited them to dinner. They ate a warm home cooked meal laced with laxatives. When they started hitting the bathroom, she locked them in that section of the house and set it and them on fire.