Yes. And correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the Bible, that these conservatives rely so heavily upon not also say that if thine eye or hand or whatever offends thee, to pluck it out, cut it off, burn it?

Well? If were really that worries about male frustration, shouldn't EVERY option of redress be considered?

If we're willing to entertain the notion of forced monogamy (Peterson) on women to alleviate these men's frustration, shouldn't we not also consider alleviating them of their problem at it's source? For fairness?

Perhaps no testicle should be left unturned. So long as it solves the problem, which is very real and shouldn't be minimized.