Yeah, you did. Trying to "be nice" about it and present a very watered down "but we don't *want* to be 'that guy' so we should try to convince women how much better we'll be if they just give it up so we don't have to use force to get our needs met" as an obligatory aside that's not really meant doesn't negate what you're promoting and ultimately advocating here.

You want to use women's bodies to prevent violence in men based on some pretty absurd notions.

Ultimately, it's always going to come down to that, no matter how much you deny it.

So, I say again, if you really believe that's the problem, then all you men need to also sign up to go pity fuck the poor dears so they won't be violent. Given that male on male violence is more severe, by the numbers, I have to ask, where's the line? Aren't you men natural problem solvers? So go solve the problem. But leave women out of it.

As far as projecting fear goes, look in the mirror, Boo. Is that not what you fear? That the number of women willing to entertain men will shrink so much you too, won't get sexed up? That those who do will also turn to forms of transactional sex as well? That there will be such a dearth of opportunities for sex that your life might be in danger.

After all, it's your belief that lack of sex is what causes violence in men. It's not my belief, so I don't have to fear that. If it's your belief, it's your fear.

I don't know how I could be more clear that I think your theory is bullshit. Maybe check out the historical references I left in another comment??

Nice attempt at gaslighting though.