Yeah, I can't get there.

It's too hard to separate out what is biologically wired, and what is a social construct. And no way to ethically test.

I will say this. If what you're saying is true, that would make human females the only species on this planet that has ever existed across 4 billion years that is reliant on a male of it's species for survival.

What are the odds?

Add into that, that humans are unique among all the other species that have ever existed in our ability to abstract and problem solve. To have the biological mechanics (opposable thumbs) to have enough manual dexterity to manipulate our environments, and to have the mental capacity to remember and pass on knowledge.

Those traits are not tied to the Y chromosome.

Again, what are the odds?

I recognize that many many me believe it. It's part of your indoctrination of gender performance, from the time that you are very little boys. It's so pervasive it's almost completely invisible.

Only when you do a species comparison do you see how ridiculous a concept it is. You can't make it make sense. Because, it defies logic. It just doesn't make sense.

You can disagree, I know I won't change your mind. Too much history and set beliefs that men will lose if women are truly free. It's just too hard for most of you to go there. Too uncomfortable. It's that way for a lot of women too. Sadly.