While I agree with you from a perspective of theory, in this instance I think you’re off the mark a bit for a couple of reasons. This situation rings a bit like the Emperor’s New Clothes in that he’s surrounded himself with sycophants (i.e. the GOP) who are failing to check his worst impulses and keep him in line. It’s gotten to the point that the only way the common people can tell him otherwise is going to be public demonstrations that cannot be ignored and are going to be personally embarrassing to him because he’s convinced himself he’s well-loved by all of America and he’s a hero of democracy and the American way. He’s out of touch with reality. Secondly, your reasoning parallels judicial rules of law but you omit the fact that when someone admits to a crime, they don’t have a trial. There’s no need. They admit they broke the law. A sentence is handed down and the person goes to jail. So it’s an apples to oranges comparison to compare Trump’s inciting chants of “Lock her up” about Hillary Clinton who has not been charged with a crime much less been put on trial for one and a sports crowd chanting “Lock him up” when he admitted publicly, on television, that he broke the law. The fact that he is unable to understand that his actions have our forefathers rolling over in their graves and that they would believe to be treasonous is irrelevant. He’s admitted freely under no duress or coercion what he did. Thirdly, impeachment isn’t a criminal trial anyway, and is therefore not necessarily subject to the same parameters of decor. A successful impeachment will remove him from office, not put him in jail. People know that — so the chant in this instance calling out his hypocrisy. This is nowhere near a worrisome threat to democracy. It wouldn’t even make a top 100 list.