Where you’re off here….

Nearly all feminists advocate for the end of violence perpetrated against ANYONE: male, female, child, adult, disabled, etc. ANYONE. They stand against exploitative violence of ANY kind.

They are quite vocal about this.

They speak against those who would commit such violence regardless of gender. That means against other women as well.

They are quite vocal about this too.

The “gendered narrative" you think you see is only because statistically speaking, most such violence is indeed perpetrated by men. Also, right now because of the gaslighting around #MeToo there’s going to be a focus there.

Child abuse is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with. No one said otherwise.

That does not negate the fact that Brian Warner has no right to proxy revenge. Articles must have a narrow focus to be functional. Just because an article talks about his abusive behavior doesn’t mean that the abuse he suffered has been discounted by “feminist narrative". It means it’s not the focus of that article. Look to other writings about the child abuse he suffered.

You make a false equivalency argument like that and you’re gonna get slammed on it. It’s gaslighting.

You know, there are a great many little boys and little girls who are abused as children. They don’t grow up to be abusers. They decide they want to be different. They do the work. They heal. They hold themselves accountable for their own growth, their own emotions, their own pain. They don’t use it as an excuse to abuse their own children or innocent others.

That was the point of my comment, which you say you agree with. So why equivocate? That line of thinking, as in your last sentence, does nothing to help advocacy against child abuse. It just makes you look like a morally bankrupt little putz who has to blame women en masse for his own pathetic character failures rather than step up, do the work, learn to adult, and be a man.