Well, you missed the point entirely of feminism asking men to protect women. Probably would have helped to understand what was being asked by reading feminist content instead of commentary on feminist content published by the manosphere. Primary sources are always preferable in serious and meaningful research, after all.

You've also widely missed the mark on several points with this one. That's a whole article in and of itself, so I won't waste energy here. Should have been pretty obvious anyway.

What you have done here, and done really well, is lay out some selfish and self absorbed thinking patterns you attribute to all men that are exercises in some pretty banal evil taken to their logical conclusions. Recall, in evaluating an idea, we don't just look at what is said, we look at what is not said and follow all that through to where it leads.

So well done on that.