This is a false argument and a false equivalence.

The argument is whether or not a woman has the right to decide what.tondonwith her own body over another's right to live. No one asks this of men.

If I need a kidney and yours is the only match viable, I cannot complete you to give me a kidney to save my life, even if you are dead and clearly aren't using it anymore. Same with your blood, same with any part of your body. The state cannot complete you on my behalf.

Provided you have not been convicted of a crime, I cannot and the state cannot force you to provide uncompensated labor for my or the state's benefit.

The state forcing labor and the production of children only to seize those children for the abortion industry is a violation of the Constitution' prohibition of unlawful search and seizure. And thanks to the opinion of ACB in the overturn, that's exactly what the Supreme Court is enabling on behalf of barren Christian women.

This is an argument of bodily autonomy. You either have it or you don't. Everything else is a distraction.