There would have to be a coherent subject to begin with to say something about it.

I'll say it again. What you've got is a big circle jerk. A nothing burger.

Edit. For the love of all that is holy. EDIT. Invest in a decent editor if you can't do it yourself. Enroll in a free course. Something. Good Lord.

Nobody's asking for academic standards. Grade 12 English is sufficient enough for a blog. And editing isn't just about command of the English language or any other language. It's about consistency, logical flow, coherence, flow, what you're saying making any sort of sense, etc.

Your English is fine. It's just not journalistic standards or high school level paper standards.

It's a mess. Recognizing that doesn't have anything to do with feminism. It's to do with k owing good writing g when you see it, and bad.

Also, HR did not call you names or make any personal assertions. She made an exasperated and snide remark about thr quality of your piece. And she was correct.

A personal attack would have looked a whole lot different. Further, what she has or had not said in comments to men promoting violence against women does not have anything to do with what was said here. If she was doing some sort of a take down or being personal, she would have pointed out how the tone of your article reeks of pickmeisha energy.