That's an assumption and just as bad.

Rittenhouse is a murderer. He killed two men. He broke the gun carry law, one similar to the one that just convicted the parents of a mass shooter btw.

Is he being unfairly censored because he's a conservative or is this a rejection of the idea that it's okay for *some* people to ignore gun carry laws and go out guns a'blazing so in a big dick swinging contest and the rest of us just have to be okay with dying so they can perform their masculinity?

I seriously doubt anyone trully cares that Rittenhouse is a conservative or speaking to a different/alternate political viewpoint.

I think most young people are refusing accept the notion of their lives and the lives of their friends being acceptable collateral damage as political fodder.

Let's not forget he's there to justify murdering two men because Black people had a civil rights march against police brutality.

Let's not lose sight of the real issue here. Winning that case because the prosecutor's office didn't bring up the carry laws enough or the jury didn't want to vote against their "culture" doesn't negate the murders or the moral obligation of decent citizens to reject the normalization of murder for some at the expense of everyone else.