That's a modern narrative that has yet to be proven true. Correlation is not causation.

100 years ago men did not marry until they had a house and could support a wife, meaning the had "a living". They weren't getting married young. Unless they were from a wealthy family, they were seeking professionals either. Most young men didn't have prostitutes available to them due to geography, anyway. Religion was a stronger driving force in society which means that, like the vast majority of young women, most young men lost their virginity on their wedding night.

It took a good decade to get up a living. Depending on when they left home, men weren't having sex until nearly 30.

One famous example of this is Almonzo Wilder. He was 28 when he married Laura Ingalls. She was his one and only. He was a few weeks shy of 29 the first time he had sex. His life is representative of what was normal for the time.

Humans have NOT evolved so much in 100 years (less really) that we could assume that the problem with young men today is lack of sex in their 20s.

The very notion is absurd, offensive, and beyond believable. It defies common sense, historical accounts, and basic deductive reasoning. Sex is not the same as food, water, or air. There have been hundreds of millions of people throughout history who have lived celibate lives. Hell fire, some religions have required it of their members. Shakers, for example.

Gotta admit, I'm surprised so many men are jumping on this bandwagon. You gentlemen are very severe on your own sex. Do so many of you really think so little of yourselves?

It's far more likely that part of your real problem is that you are inundated with sex via marketing and porn from too young an age. You're starting to think about it younger and it's everywhere. The constant bombardment means you feel the lack of it as a sting to your self esteem that has never been the case before and also your ability to achieve true sexual satisfaction is greatly lessened.

You act like addicts, super twitchy for your next hit, and fall in raging withdrawals when no one wants to provide it.

Though why so many of you men are confused that women don't want to be your next molly is beyond me. Not only would you be incapable of reaching sexual satisfaction vs a fleeting instant gratification, you'd be incapable of satisfying a partner too.

Obviously, men seem to have more going on than this. Wage disparity and education divestment are issues as well. There are others too.