She does have a point to make, but she came no where near making it.

I just read through it again (for the 3rd time) and it's still all over the place to me.

What she's saying just isn't logical. I'm sorry, but it's not. Also seems like many of the people who point out the illogic nature, are being accused of white washing, etc. But it seems to me this idea shes promoting is what's more likely to lead to hate rhetoric. If Indigenous people were in the Americas all along, from the time people's started migrating out of Africa, then Indigenous people must have arose from a different ancestor species than the rest of us did. That makes the rest of the world Bomo sapiens and Indigenous people Homo something else, maybe Homo americanensis. We would be sifferent species in order for her claim to be true.

For clarity, the article hinted at this, but in the comments she's doubled down on this idea and flat out stated that Indigenous people have no connection to Africa whatsoever.

Then she's using DNA markers that Indigenous people have to "prove" they're completely separate from all others.