Plus, Roe. Wade did give abortion restrictions for.3rd trimester, so the restrictions the author is accusing the radical feminists of refusing to compromise on were already in place. How can you "overplay your hand" against proposed restrictions when those very same restrictions have already been in place for half a century. Ridiculous.

Abortions were already going down with improvements in birth control and access to it. Roe v. Wade clearly hasn't made people callous to life, or whatever, when so many are choosing to prevent unwanted pregnancies rather than get rid of them after the fact. It would be cheaper over all and easier on their bodies to just abort for many women rather than jump through all the hoops and dealing with the side effects getting birth control. It's not like we women don't know this and know it well. The author's argument here is also clearly nonsense.

I'm sick of this Big Lie too. They can't even make it make logical sense.