No. You're only recognizing and quantifying one type of sexual frustration: lack of "enough". You're using that argument to justify the absurd notion that men experience sexual frustration at higher rates and more profoundly than women.

This means you're ignoring every bit of evidence, observation, common sense, and outcries of frustration from every.fucking.body else to push a narrative that is blatantly false, self centered, harmful to men and women, and scientifically unsound.

AGAIN.

You don't listen.

Numerous people have pointed out the fallacy of your 'theory' with ridiculous ease. It's like a turkey shoot, it's so obvious to just about everyone but you. Continually doubling down is not going to change that fact.

You have no evidence that men experience more sexual frustration than women. You have an androcentric narrative you've chosen to back at everyone's expense. This is about an ego, driven belief, not reality.

Gaslighting about who understands science and who doesn't won't help your cause either.