No, that's evidence that he's being dismissed, not evidence that he is being demonized.

Dismissal is what we do to cranks. Conspiracy theorists generally get dismissed, religious nutters generally get dismissed, raving lunatics in the street generally get dismissed, Karen's get dismissed, loud mouthed sports freaks get dismissed, and toddlers throwing tantrums get dismissed.

That's the generslly accepted response when people are bloviating nonsense.

Enforced monogamy is nonsense.

As for him having ABSOLUTELY nothing of value to say....like that first book of his, nothing revolutionary there and nothing scores of other people aren't also saying. That first book was mostly common sense, as far as the 12 principles or however he laid it out. It was a long form listicle, nothing more. The point is, it's not like he's the only source to get that info. You can still get that info for consideration without giving time and space to someone who's also flapping femicide as a swell idea.

Kinda like how if I want to buy my hound some canned duck dogfood and myself a bag of carrots and the store informs me it is no longer carrying dogfood because dogs are disgusting and should all be forced to a mill and ground into chicken feed....then I'm not buying my carrots there either. I'm going to a different store. That store management has gone completely wackadoodle talking nonsense about taking people's dogs that they've loved, cared for, invested in, and made part of the family. There's no way to carry that out without some mass act of inhumane brutality.

You don't give energy to wackadoodle. You don't want that shit catching on.

Does he have the right to be a Wingnut? Sure. Absolutely. Free speech and all that jazz.

But that goes both ways. So too, does Chrystal have the right to call out wackadoodle notions that can only happen through a mass act of inhumane brutality (femicide) for what they are and admonish her readers to not give energy to wackadoodle nonsense.