No offense, I don't feel I did miss the point. I get what you're saying...

I'm just saying that there are a few things not being looked at in this discussion. I'm saying the question itself misses the mark. There are successful parents who go it alone with minimal support, both male and female. Your analysis marks them as abberations.

I'm saying they intrinsically have, or have figured out something the standard model hasn't. Because if you look at these "aberrations", they have some striking similarities.

I'm saying maybe the question shouldn't be what do mothers and fathers separately orivide for their children based on gender stereotypes. Maybe the question should be what do children need to become healthy and whole human beings who can thrive in the world?

Maybe collectively adults need to ditch our ideas about ownership of children and collectively build the paths they need to get those things, no matter who it's from.