No. But you can respect the fact that she's been there. She's been impoverished. She's been a single mom. She's been attacked by the father of her child.

She's a survivor. Now she helps other women survive and move on.

Past rights do not negate current wrongs.

Past wrongs done to you will color your considerations of present and future events. How could they not?

You can respect the nuance and the fact that it's complicated and make your argument. bashing Rowling for acting like an abuse survivor now trying to protect women from future abuse.