Neither. It's sexual economics. Women who provide sexual services to men for pay or recompense are prostitutes. Look it up.
It's a commodity that has value. You guys can't have it both ways either. If you feel shame about being a prostitute, that's a you problem.
Cindy makes a false equivalency and therein lies the problem with sugar babies.
Sugar babies aren't competition. They are a distraction. A fancy bling to make other men jealous and thus provide status. Disposable cum buckets that ultimately take from the wife's children.
You can say it's just jealousy all day long but that false equivalency doesn't make it so.
And here it is.
Sugar babies are prostitutes because they are selling their bodies for money. Sure, they're high end prostitutes (You go girl!) and more than a street hooker, a sugar baby may be able to maintain fiscretuon enough to be able to walk away from it and if they're smart, they'll walk away better off financially.
The reality is, most don't. They get "gifts" that depreciate they minute they've left the store more than cold hard cash that can be invested. When you get dumped, you've become accome accustomed to a lifestyle you can no longer fund because your skill set is looking pretty and being a party girl who digs kinky sex. And unlike literally any other profession, even a fast food worker, youre depreciating just like that couture handbag every time you get traded out. A fast food worker can always go work for abother restaurant. Always. And no new employer is ever going to say or think that they've been used so much they're like a used slot machine. They will always have some economic value.
Further, very few wives get into marriages with the I tent of selling their bodies for money or gifts. It's not a capitalist exchange in their minds and their hearts. They're looking to couple fairly for stability and a 'nest' to raise children in. Sure, financial stability comes into play because you are looking for stability, especially during those early child rearing years, because you may be down. You could have a traumatic birth or a sick kid. The more stable you are before that, the better chances those circumstances don't turn catastrophic for everyone involved.
But financial stability does not and never had equalled obscene wealth... swimming pools, and movie stars and overpriced handbags. It means financially stable, not wasteful, not an unnecessary risk.
Wives aren't selling sex. Never have. That's NOT their jam.
So here's a question.
If being a sugar baby is so great and just part of the capitalist landscape and not not morally wuestionable, and doesn't hurt anyone, and nothing to be ashamed of and all the things....
Why balk at being correctly identified as a prostitute? If sex is never more than a marketplace, why keep trying to hide what you are? Why the constant cries of "jealousy" when wives point out that they didn't sell sex or beauty? Why the false equivalency that there's no difference?
If you're so goddamned proud of being a capitalist boss babe, why are you all so ashamed? Wby do you have to make wives out to be whores to face that mirror every morning?
tick tock.
