Maybe, but you're not getting around the fact that for slaves in America, chattel slavery was based on identity. The iidentity of their black skin.

No matter how much you try, you canot wish or reason identity away. Not when identities have been created since history began to determine who gets what and whether your little shuffling experiment has a positive outcome for you or a negative one.

You know, it's a little weird that you always stand against liberals for embracing the identities they didn't create in the first place instead of allowing themselves to be shamed by greedy sefish fuckheads who benefit by you thInking you don't deserve a fair seat at the table so they get more.

You seem to want to pretend that identities don't exist or that their some sticky fig newton of someone's imagination after they got a wild hair up their ass one day.

Yet the whole premise of your argument is already based on identity politics.

So you recognize identity when it's convenient for YOU to make a point.

But never when it's about fighting for human rights and human dignity after millenia of being denied that seat at the table based on what?

What was it again?

What WAS that criteria filter of who is deserving and who is not?

Wasn't it something.....something to do with.....who you are? How you were born? Who you were born to? What you look like?

Your identity?

Remind us all again. Who benefitted from that winnowing of human bodies? Who's still benefitting?