Just because you don’t agree doesn’t make anyone’s earnest fact based dissent a 'strawman' argument. I absolutely addressed the points in question and did not bring up anything outside the topic at hand.
Your premise (which was also clearly rebuffed btw) is that women are better suited to relationships and nurturing because they have evolved biological adaptations and specializations as reproductive strategies. I spoke in terms of biology and evolution.
Either you don’t know what a straw man argument is, you’re too entrenched in old paradigms to consider the world around you properly, or you’re gaslighting.

Whatever.

You’re clearly not interested in an honest intellectual exchange. Your snipe-like comments designed to poke wound you imagine around my parents' failed marriage prove it.

By the way, most people would agree that certain violations of oath, like abusive behavior, are grounds to nullify the obligations of marriage. It does not serve God, society, or evolutionary advantage to have one party conduct themselves with integrity and the other like a brute or a troll.

So much for your moral superiority.