It's not me that missed the mark my guy.

You asked why date the older lady. You date, presumably, to get married. Dating has an end goal, otherwise you're just hooking up.

If you're just hooking up, I agree with you.

If you're dating with thr intent of finding a partner, who pays for the dates is less important. Once you form a household, under marriage, you share assets.

Would you rather share assets with a McDonald's worker or the older, wealthier lady? Again, under the presumption that you're not doing well financially because you can't pay for dates?

It's not contrary to feminism to be practical abut life matters. Lord knows men are. And there are many other things one can bring to a relationship. Money isn't everything.

I support women's standards no matter what they are. Mostly because so many .en are always insincere with their intent and far too many are akuldugging around for sex far too much.

You don't have to date a woman if you don't want to meet her standards. Plain and simple. But she has the right to them, no matter what they are.

I do believe that if men want to be treated, they need to step into the opposite role and in my experience, they won't do that. It makes them bad dates. That's been my experience but I know other women who are financially sound who had more success, or maybe dealing with them didn't bother them.

You'll recall my child is a daughter, not a son. She's an asset to the household, not a basement troll, so she can stay as long as she wants. If she was a basement troll, I'd be ready for her to go. But let's be real, had she been male, he would still be an asset to the household because he wouldn't have been mollycoddled. And he could stay as long as he wants too.