SC
2 min readMar 21, 2023

--

I'm with you on this one. It's too far, to the point of just being a different kind cog to an industry, rather than a full human being. Sure, it's nice to know that everything is free and to be away from money. But is that worth the price required?

The egalitarian aspect is great, if it's true.

Honestly, though....I couldn't deal with those dresses. They're hideous. I don't just mean that they're super ugly, which is also true, or the headress which is a hard no for me (it would be touching my hair. Eww). The design of the dress is one of the most impractical ones imaginable. How do they get anything done? It's so restrictive and confining. You have to know that affects your thought processes and would even suppress your spirituity.

And let's not mince words. Nobody wears that level of cover up by choice. It's because of men, to supposedly protect them from their lustful nature. So how can you be an equal part of the body of Christ if your body is bad? So bad that half the population has to be protected from you? So bad that you have to be bound in restrictive, ridiculous clothing that hampers your movements and prevents you from truly running and playing and working to your full capability, and exercising too?

You can't.

Have to wonder. Were any of the little girls covered in mud from head to toe? Why not? Are they being censured from true and full play?

I'm questioning the egalitarianism. This kind of thing never leads to real egalitarianism anywhere else. So I'm deeply skeptical of that.

--

--

No responses yet