If there are no wrong feelings and thoughts, then why are you, personally, get so angry when someone else is expressing concern over a trend? Doesn't that count as a diverse viewpoint in your (you personally) book? Why are you, personally, assuming those expressing their thoughts and concerns are attempting to police thoughts?

That's not very welcoming of diverse thoughts, bro.

Further, what does your personal desire to have an AI girlfriend or not have an AI girlfriend have to do with anything?

The only ridiculous assumption being made here is that YOU, personally, assumed that I was talking about YOU specifically when I used the 2nd person plural form of the pronoun 'you' in my previous comment.

That was a universal you, bro. Not you specifically and personally.

You (men who feel the need or urge to abuse AI girlfriends).

Contextually, that was as clear as day. Come on. What were we talking about?Men who abuse AI girlfriends? Exactly. Not men in general and not you personally.

Why do you (men trying to derail conversations by acting dumb) always try to obfuscate issues when your arguments are losing by suddenly pretending you don't understand how pronouns work?

See? That one does include you personally because you just did that. See how context works? This isn't hard.

Nobody is trauma dumping or making assumptions about you.

The only projecting going on is on your end. Women and some older, more mature and emotionally balanced men are discussing what a certain trend might mean for women down the road but you, personally, feel attacked by that discussion for some reason, and so you, personally, are leveling accusations of thought policing and censorship that don't exist.

Whatever happened to 'do what makes you happy'? Apparently that's not truly meant to apply to everyone.