I mean, you're basically saying the same thing I am.

The danger here is equally being too dismissive of all the aberrations because some quacks on the internet saw 'smoke' and cried 'bomb'.

Quacks are gonna quack. They always do.

Just because a few quacks draw quacks conclusions doesn't mean they didn't see smoke, the smoke that really is there.


So yes. Be prudent. Wait for fact. Try not to promote or give too much breath or energy to quackery.

But don't be dismissive of a real problem either, just because of the quacks.

That incident never should have happened. It shouldn't have been possible.

Check out the smoke. See what's what.