I get where you're going with that, and that's better. But to me...it's still problematic and indicative of this constant thing of where men always seem to want and be given instant credit for the successes of men as a whole but dodge or not be burdened with the failures.

In the end, that's where #NotAllMennstems from.

Do you like working with men. Which men? Any man? A random man? Under what conditions? What's the situation?

Like in that sentence means to enjoy, which invites comparison naturally. Actually, 'like' invites comparison, even subconscious comparison, in almost every use.

Like more than what? Not working with men? Working with women or children?

Just what're we talking about here?

The question, in my opinion. Is just far too ambiguous, especially in that setting, to be answered intelligently because 'like' is ambiguous in nature.

And THEN to just leave it hanging like that.

I'm with you on that. Useless in a workshop. It doesn't show bias at all.

And for the author to claim that it does like he did, with that conflationary and click bait title, completely ignoring the history of bias against women when men rules the profession and is still ongoing to be fair, was just irresponsible, unprofessional, irrational, and rude.