I find this difficult to answer with some minor equivocation. It's in the question.

Here's the thing. Part of the reason we are facinf the conundrum we are facing is because of somebody doing something they thought would make life better for everyone. If nothing else, becoming collapse aware should disabuse most normal folks of that hubris.

It has me.

So...can we say "that we think will help everyone without unexpected negative consequence at a later date"

In other words, if said acrmtion is really just kicking a can down the road....my answer is no. The bill comes due sooner or later. Might as well be sooner.

If we can definitely say there will be no negative future consequence...then yes. Everything I have.

But that camt include Urchling, because reationhips aren't possessions any more than the people in them. Someome in the comments brought that up. The hell?