I don't think you're evil. I think you dont think about what you're saying. I think you get an idea into your head you become enamored with and are then unreasonably insulted when someone points out that it's a dud thought. Unsound.

I think you have an over tendency to 'relate' based on the wrong things in a self centered way. And again, you just run wild with it without really thinking it through. It's not an issue with English not being your first language either.

I think you have a deep need to be seen as a 'good guy'. You need that validation because you can't create your own.

I think you're more like the guy who sells tickets for the path over the cliff than up the hill. This last is more of that.

You think that because you've more or less successfully narcotized that patriarchal inner wound with sex, that if more men just got sex they'd be fine too. But you can become addicted to sex and chasing after sex. No addict has ever been satisfied or satiated. They won't be okay. Frequency of sex is not their problem.

If your friend's wife was somehow magically compelled to give him that coveted bj every day, he'd be just as frustrated and end up just as lonely.

That's because most men need more from sex than a point spread.

You consistently fail to realize that and address it.

Lastly, yes you did. It wasn't just me who got that from that article. What you said and how you said it absolutely dehumanized, maligns, and denigrated women. We are not fuck dolls or vending machines that are refusing to work properly just to hurt men.

None of that makes you evil. It makes you someone problematic to buy a ticket from. In other words, what you're selling isn't going to get the average men where he wants to be.