I don’t have time to go through all of this, but clearly your “research” has been one sided. Which means it’s not real research.

I’ll point out a few.

I remember the protests after Trump’s election. I recall singing, signs, and weird crocheted hats. I don’t recall nooses, beating police officers, or pipe bombs. Apples and oranges. You clearly did not read my previous comment carefully as I specifically acknowledged most were there to peacefully protest. They were protesting a lie, but they have the right to do so. The protest wasn’t the problem, the lawlessness and subversion were.

Again, read through more carefully what I said about BLM protests. I’m not the one with the double standard here. Those who started fires should be brought to justice too. A great many of them have and the FBI is still investigating. Check your sources, not Facebook.

The cases were laughed out of court. The procedure you’re referring to is evidentiary procedure. The problem was not a legal slight of hand over procedure but the fact that you can’t have evidentiary discovery without evidence. A stack of affidavits is not evidence until it can be reviewed and verified. Until then it’s a stack of papers. Most of those cases were dismissed without prejudice by courts benched by CONSERVATIVE judges. That means they could have been refiled if they ever found any evidence. They haven’t refiled because claiming you have evidence and actually producing it for review are not the same thing. You cannot prove fraud without evidence of fraud.

Speculation is not evidence. Somebody saw a van is not evidence. Dinner got delivered is not evidence. Sharpie gate is not evidence. Wishful thinking is not evidence.

Multiple audits in challenged states have delivered the same results. The election was free and fair. There was no fraud. Trump lost. By a lot.

That shouldn’t be surprising because people tend to stop following bad leaders. 400K+ people died on his watch, his term has been filled with scandal after scandal, he failed to deliver on campaign promises, he’s made us a laughing stock on the world stage, he’s made the lives of average Americans worse, he’s administration has been so corrupt, he put the most powerful office in the world up for sale for favors, he’s made human rights violations policy, and no impeached president had ever been elected.

Speaking of impeachments, your charge of partisan impeachment is moot. Unfortunately, the Constitutional drafting of impeachment proceedings was established before long standing political parties were a thing. George Washington warned against forming political parties in his farewell address. Since their permanent placement on the political scene, all impeachments are partisan. So what? So was Johnson’s impeachment and so was Clinton’s impeachment. There’s no real point here.

Robert DeNiro is a private citizen not a public official. His comments are protected by free speech, they may have been somewhat obscene but they weren’t threatening. Maxine Waters' comments were out of line, not for what she said (she can say what she wants too) but because she shouldn’t have said them as a public official. Will you condemn Trump for his equivalently nasty comments toward her, and other Congresspeople? It’s not right to applaud him for being a political bruiser, saying he’s “for the people" and then want to blast everyone else for punching back. Guess what? They’re “for the people too", duly and lawfully elected.

If not, there’s no point in any further discussion because you want different rules for different groups. That shit won’t fly with me.