I don't describe *men* with awful language. I describe *some men* with awful language. Specifically PUA types and their apologists, misogynists who believe they are entitled to women, and rape and rape culture apologists.

If you think that applies to all men, that's a you problem. But you should know, it doesn't. There are plenty of men out there who want a mutually loving relationship and not just a fuck maid. There are plenty of guys out there who will go out of their way to help someone out if they can.

But you won't find them in the manosphere. To a one, every man I've seen in the manosphere is a selfish, self serving, self absorbed, ego driven, entitled little prick.

It is what it is. And that's what got them where they are. It's not because women are gatekeepers sex, hypergamous, or whatever.

And anyone who gives space to their grievance ends up picking up and validating those same things.

Simon's article reeked of entitlement to women's bodies. You've written ones that reeked of self serving ego. Or another that reeked of selfish entitlement.

It's good to have an open mind. It's not good to be so open that your brains fall out.

Which brings us back around to....if you wouldn't fuck these men, don't demand, ask, suggest, hint, or propose that it would be a good thing for women to.