His thoughts on this article ARE incomplete. He can do better. He's earned a PhD, it's not like he doesn't know how to write logical arguments. He's also had to defend a thesis in front of a room full of academics who will not accept weak arguments.

I think he can handle some adversarial scrutiny from me and a few others, particularly given his intent most certainly IS to criticize what he calls extremes of feminism.

I make no claim as to what others should think about or listen to. I'm not an authoritarian and unlike so many of my male peers, I trust my fellow women and men to weigh things out for themselves and make up their own damn mind. I have no desire for the responsibility or the burden of commanding or controlling other people.

I speak for myself and myself alone. If other women agree with me, that's awesome, but they can speak for their own damn selves. If other women disagree with me, that's awesome too, and guess what? They can speak for their own damn selves too.