Hardly. Go back and read it again.

You didn't say anything about inciting violence, I did. I brought it up because it's the classic exception to free speech. I didn't make up the First Amendment. A bunch of rebels did back in the 18th century. Most of us are pretty glad they did. Glad enough to make that the standard regarding speech rules in public.

Which brings us back to what you said. You said Behar is responsible for women being "anti-men", or however you phrased it a few comments back, by modelling strident misandrist comments that millions of women will absorb and emulate.

But the First amendment recognizes that adults are responsible for their own conduct. That unless you are specifically inciting violence, what you say, even as a public figure has no bearing on the conduct another adult chooses to exhibit, or what they believe, or what opinions they form, or any attitudes they have.

Your continuing insistance that Joy Behar is responsible for what women may or may not believe about men just because she has a platform and an attitude you don't like is not only infantalizing to women, it flies in the face of what we hold to regarding civil rights. Women do not need or want your "help" here. It's actually not helpful or good for us.

You're entitled to your opinion. Women not accepting it is not due to being bewitched by Behar's "anti-men rhetoric" but because your opinion is biased and diminishes us. Most of us are going to see your opinion for exactly what it is.