Because you're all over the place on this. I'm talking about one thing. The credibility of feminists calling for the deaths of all men. That's the claim you've made. That's what I need to see some evidence on.

I have no reason to believe you were not raped. It's certainly possible. I can believe some women have been unkind and demeaning to you. Women can be prejudiced too.

But being a woman doesn't automatically make one a feminist. And you've veen back and forth here. First it was on the internet women were calling for the deaths of men, then it was IRL, now it's feminists.

When you first broufhr this up, I didn't not believe you, any more than I would automatically not believe someone who claimed they had been raped.

As I recall, my original response to the challenge (why don't feminists clap back when women write about killing men) was that I most certainly would but I hadn't seen it and that the internet is a huge place. I asked where you were seeinf this so I could check it out for myself.

But you've been inconsistent in your claim. Who's doing this and exactly what is being said keeps changing, from article to article , every time you bring it up in the comments.

So now, just like if the raped claimant had some major inconsistencies in their story—not minor ones, major ones—im yoing to need to examine some evidence.

Because you've been inconsistent.

I still don't not believe you. You're clearly upset over something that's happened. But I'm not 100% convinced it's what you've said here, that feminists are calling for the massacre of men.