Because until that applies across the board, which is not what you stated, you’re still setting men as the default human being and everyone else less than.

You’re contradicting yourself all over the place and you don’t know what you’re talking about.

This is not inclusion. This is erasure and clearly, you know it.

So here’s a question. If Transwomen want inclusion, why aren’t they satisfied with being called a woman with Trans being a descriptor? In all this talk I’ve never seen a Transwoman or advocate refer to them as anything less than a Transwoman. They’ll go on and on about how they’re real women too.

Okay.

But then natal women have to be menstruating persons or persons with a uterus.

So why is it suddenly that only people who transition from manhood to womanhood get to be called women of any sort but women who were born that way are degraded to reproductive organs and functions?

How does that figure in your grand scheme for inclusion? Gonna be honest, seems more like theft through chicanery than a request or even a demand for inclusion. And you really wonder why natal women became so irate? Did any of you even listen to what you were saying before you started spouting this nonsense?