SC
Nov 5, 2020

--

And that’s not reactionary?

Assuming that 65% is accurate, is it less or more than the percentage that voted for him last time?

What’s the percentage change of other groups? More or less? Does that factor into your accountability narrative at all?

I’d be willing to bet the biggest support comes from age/ gender divide this time around, not racial ones. So how much punishment is sufficient to dole out to Grandma and Grandpa?Got enough room in prison for all the men? Assuming that plays out, are you going to advocate holding the aged and men responsible with the same vigor?

Yeah. I thought not.

You’ve also ignored the group percentages of eligible voters who didn’t even show up to vote. How do they get off in your equation?

Histrionics of blame really don’t help. It just acts to further divide us. It also ignores the heavy handed influence of the electoral college. It’s not just a matter of who voted for whom and why but where those votes are located and how much weight they have because of it.

65% is not accurate.

It’s 57%. So it’s about the same as the last election (where 58% voted Republican).

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54783016

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

--

--

Responses (2)